In past blog entries I have shown that
chirality is an important property of molecules. In molecules intended to be
used as drugs, chirality may be extremely important since the biological effect
directly depending on the stereochemistry of the compound (e.g. the thalidomide).
The administration of enantiopure drugs brings benefits in terms of improved efficacy, and reduced toxicity. Consequently, it is not strange that 7 out of the top 10 most selling-drugs worldwide in 2010 are commercialized as enantiopure forms. Therefore, it is relevant to have synthetic methods to access these chiral compounds obtaining just only the enantiomer we are interested in.
The administration of enantiopure drugs brings benefits in terms of improved efficacy, and reduced toxicity. Consequently, it is not strange that 7 out of the top 10 most selling-drugs worldwide in 2010 are commercialized as enantiopure forms.
Let’s "cook" chiral molecules!
The
synthesis of chiral compounds is addressed by an area of chemistry called
enantioselective synthesis. Simply: it is the synthesis of a compound by a
method that favours the formation of a specific enantiomer. Enantioselective
synthesis is a key process in modern chemistry and is particularly important in
the field of pharmaceuticals. It has also a prominent role in the food,
agrochemical, and perfumery industries.
On the other hand, we must recognize that the
social demands on the current chemistry are increasingly higher. Selectivity should
be applied to every single stage of chemical production. It is useless to
produce the enantiomer with no biological effect (and/or toxic effects). In
fact, it is considered waste, so it is worth focusing on obtaining the useful
enantiomer only. Chemical waste is not a trivial issue considering that usually
chemical synthesis is scaled-up (e.g. production of pharmaceuticals or
agrochemicals) and this may be very costly in industrial processes where the
economic aspects are crucial.
Chirality cannot be created in molecules by a
random chemical process. When a random chemical reaction is used to prepare
molecules having chirality, there is an equal opportunity to prepare the
left-handed isomer as well as the right-handed isomer. In addition, and more
relevant, the preferential formation in a chemical reaction of one enantiomer
over the other is result of the influence of a chiral feature present in the
substrate, reagent, catalyst or environment. Chemical synthesis of a chiral
molecule from simpler non-chiral precursors usually produces equal amounts of
both enantiomers. For this reason, we strictly need a source of chirality.
The three
main approaches to access chiral compounds are:
Chiral (or
optical) resolution of racemic mixtures:
Namely, physical separation of the pair of
enantiomers contained in a 50/50 mixture. This involves the isolation of one
enantiomer from the racemic mixture by any of a number of methods. Where the cost
in time and money of making such racemic mixtures is low, or if both
enantiomers may find use, this approach may remain cost-effective.
Synthetic
transformations from an enantiomerically pure starting compound:
In the
particular case of using an easily available natural compound as starting material it is called chiral
pool synthesis. This methodology is more useful when the desired final product and
the chiral compound used are structurally similar. Carbohydrates, amino acids,
hydroxy acids and terpenes integrate the chiral pool arsenal.
This approach involves the use of a prochiral substrate and an enantiopure reagent as a source of chirality, in stoichiometric (auxiliary) or substoichiometric (catalytic) amounts, which is not included in the final product.
In the next blog entries we are going to have a close look to these three different approaches to have access to chiral compounds highlighting pros and cons of each method.
Comments
Post a Comment